Google

  Ask The Doc      Catalogue    Drug Search      Sitemap  Yellow Pages 

Home Complementary
Medicine
Conditions Family
Health
Legalities &
Informatics
 News &
Updates
 Health
Resources
 Support
Groups
                               

- Introduction
- Ethics manual
- Ethics of 
  Practice

- Clinical
  Investigation

- Innovative
  Medical
  Therapies
- Scientific
  Publication

- Public
  Announcement
  of Research
  Discoveries

- Conclusion

 

- Telemedicine
- Euthanasia
- Investments
- Research
- Insurance
- Medical   Jurisprudence

 

- Complementary   Medicine
- Family Health &   Lifestyle
- Conditions
- News & Updates
- Health Resources
- Support Groups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home > Legalities and Informatics > Medical Ethics > Innovative Medical Therapies      

Medical Ethics

Innovative Medical Therapies 

The use of innovative medical therapies falls along the continuum between established practice and research. 

Highlights

Physician-assisted
   suicide or
   euthanasia



Innovative therapies include the use of unconventional dosages of standard medications, previously untried applications of known procedures, and the use of approved drugs for non-approved indications. The primary purpose of innovative medical therapies is to benefit the individual patient. Clinicians will confront the ethical issues of innovative practice more frequently than the ethical problems of medical research. Important medical advances have emerged from successful innovations, but innovation should always be approached carefully. Medical therapy should be treated as research whenever data are gathered to develop new medical information and for publication. When an innovative therapy has no precedent, consultation with peers, an institutional review board, or another expert group is necessary to assess the risks of the innovation, the probable outcomes of not using a standard therapy, and whether the innovation is in the patient's best interest . Informed consent is particularly important; patients must understand that the therapy is not standard treatment.

Scientific Publication

Authors of research reports must be sufficiently acquainted with the work being reported that they can take public responsibility for the integrity of the study and the validity of the findings, and they must have substantially contributed to the research itself. Sources of funding for the research project must be disclosed to potential collaborators in the research and must be included in the manuscript for publication see the section on conflicts of interest.

Scientists build on the published work of other researchers and can proceed with confidence only if they can assume that the previously reported facts on which their work is based have been reported accurately. All scientists have a professional responsibility to be honest in their publications. They must describe methods accurately and in sufficient detail, report only observations that were actually made, make clear in the manuscript which information derives from the author's work and which comes from others (and where it was published), assure readers that research has been carried out in accordance with ethical principles, and assign authorship only to persons who merit and accept authorship.

Plagiarism is unethical. Incorporating the words of others or one's own published words, either verbatim or by paraphrasing without appropriate attribution, is unethical and may have legal consequences.

 

Public Announcement of Research Discoveries

In this era of rapid communication and intense media and public interest in medical news, it has become common for clinical investigators or their institutions to call press conferences and make public announcements of new research developments. Although it is desirable for the media to obtain accurate information about scientific developments, researchers should approach public pronouncements carefully and use language that does not invite misinterpretation or unjustified extrapolation.

In general, press releases should be issued and press conferences held only after the research has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented in a proper and complete abstract so that the details of the study are available to the scientific community. Statements of scientists receive great visibility. An announcement of preliminary results, even couched in the most careful terms, is frequently reported by the media as a "breakthrough." Care must be taken to avoid raising false public expectations and embarrassing the scientists involved, both of which reduce the credibility of the scientific community as a whole.

Conclusion

We hope that this Manual will help physicians, whether they are clinicians, educators, or research scientists, to address some of the challenging ethical dilemmas that confront them each day. The Manual is written for physicians by a physician organization as we attempt to find our way through difficult terrain. Our ultimate intent is to improve the quality of care provided to patients and to give an account of the conduct of the virtuous physician in whom patients and the public may justifiably place their trust.

 

 

 

  

E-mail this page to a friend

  Sitemap | Contact us | Disclaimer | Copyright 2007 aarogya.com all rights reserved