Google

  Ask The Doc      Catalogue    Drug Search      Sitemap  Yellow Pages 

Home Complementary
Medicine
Conditions Family
Health
Legalities &
Informatics
 News &
Updates
 Health
Resources
 Support
Groups
                               

- Introduction

 Ethics Manual

- Patients' Rights
- Physician and
  Patient

- Genetic Testing
- Alternative
  Treatments

- Disability
  Certification

- Care of the
  Physician's
  Family, Friends
  and Employees
- Determination of
  Death

- Organ Donation
- Irreversible Loss
  of
  Consciousness

- Intravenous
  Fluids and
  Artificial
  Feedings

 

- Telemedicine
- Euthanasia
- Investments
- Research
- Insurance
- Medical   Jurisprudence

- Complementary   Medicine
- Family Health &   Lifestyle
- Conditions
- News & Updates
- Health Resources
- Support Groups

Home Legalities and Informatics > Medical Ethics > Ethics Manual > Loss of Consciousness   

Ethics Manual

Highlights

Patients Near
    the End of Life

Advance Care
    Planning

Problems of
    Life-Sustaining
    Treatments

Irreversible Loss of Consciousness

Persons who are in a persistent vegetative state are unconscious  but not brain dead. Since their condition is not progressive, patients in a persistent vegetative state are not terminally ill. They lack awareness of their surroundings and the ability to respond purposefully to them. The prognosis for these patients varies with cause. Some physicians and medical societies believe that there are no medical indications for life-prolonging treatment or access to intensive care or respirators when patients are confirmed to be in a persistent vegetative state.  

 

They conclude that these patients cannot experience any benefits or suffer any discomfort and that all interventions should therefore be withdrawn. However, many patients or families value life in and of itself regardless of  the neurologic state. For these reasons, goals of care should guide decisions about life-prolonging treatment for patients in a persistent vegetative state in the same manner as for other patients without decision-making capacity. 

Intravenous Fluids and Artificial Feedings

Artificial administration of nutrition and fluids is a life-prolonging treatment. As such, it is subject to the same principles for decisions as other treatments. Some stages of illness / diseases require high levels of proof before previous statements or advance directives can be accepted as firm evidence that a patient would not want these treatments in the setting of terminal illness, permanent unconsciousness, or advanced dementia. For this reason, physicians should counsel patients to establish advance care directives and complete these carefully. Clinically, there is unfounded concern that discontinuing the use of feeding tubes will cause suffering from hunger or thirst despite research findings to the contrary. Physicians should carefully address this issue with family and caregivers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

E-mail this page to a friend

  Sitemap | Contact us | Disclaimer | Copyright 2007 aarogya.com all rights reserved