12 February, 2010
Since the second half of the 20th century – beginning in the ’50s with the beat generation and the hippies of the ’60s – we’ve seen the rise of a form of spirituality which is more independent and self–defining than traditional streams. The main difference is that, unlike Sufism, Baul or Zen for instance , it did not arise out of any existing religion and, thus, had no carryover baggage.
At the same time it would be wrong to say it’s a new religion because there’s generally no subscription to a First Cause as something separate from the self. Rather, the idea of divinity is diffused into environmental concerns, individual development, transpersonal psychology and complementary & alternative medicine ( CAM).
CAMs are of special interest as they’ve adopted a similar language and spiritual life of their own alongside conventional medicine from which of course none of them spring. These include herbalism , acupuncture, Ayurveda , biofeedback, meditation, yoga and diet–based therapies.
In developing countries various forms have always been practised but the trend now shows that it’s spreading to developed countries as well. A 2002 survey of US adults 18 years and older, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics indicated that nearly 55% used CAM in conjunction with conventional medicine. Not only that, a 2008 survey by the American Hospital Association found that more than 37% of responding hospitals said they offer one or more alternative medicine therapies.
Even the Harvard Medical School says that a variety of CAMs are being seriously studied in its institutions these days. “Conventional medicine ,” it comments , “has been too slow to study alternative medicine treatments, some of which have won the confidence of healers and patients for thousands of years.” Also, a rising number of medical colleges there have started offering pre– and post–graduate semesters in what they call integrative studies.
Once again, CAM is not a new medical system. It too does not subscribe to an empirically rigorous evidence–based system. Instead , it considers the body to be a diffuse entity which is greater than the sum of its organs, tissues and cells and involves the active participation of at least a mind, if not a psyche or spirit. Its inclusion in mainstream medicine can only indicate, hopefully, a more spiritually healthy paradigm shift.
Disclaimer: The news story on this page is the copyright of the cited publication. This has been reproduced here for visitors to review, comment on and discuss. This is in keeping with the principle of ‘Fair dealing’ or ‘Fair use’. Visitors may click on the publication name, in the news story, to visit the original article as it appears on the publication’s website.